DEVELOPING STUDENTS' CREATIVITY:
significance of creativity variations
Tom Balchin, Brunel University or college
Norman Knutson, Higher Education Academy
It is difficult to find ways to focus on examining just how much creativity a student possesses. I recommend that examining the relationship among creativity and cognitive styles is useful to explore, and have found research, notably Guilford 1980; Kirton 1976; Messick1984 and Witkin and Goodenough 1981 that shows that cognitive styles have an effect upon pondering, problem solving, making decisions and creating.
This opportunity of analysis appears to be a productive one for several reasons. First, evaluating styles in relationship to creativity can assist researchers and teachers in discovering what kinds of creativity methods work best with what kinds of people and below what kinds of situations (Stein 1975). Secondly, understanding style could help an individual to understand why another individual approaches or solves problems differently than your self. Finally, understanding style may be very important for the ones that rely on group creativity. Research has demonstrated that persons of various variations will possess different innovative strengths and weaknesses (Bloomberg 1967, Kirton 1976 and Spotts and Mackler 1967). Utilizing the styles and strengths, which usually various persons bring to a group, will enable the group to function better and efficiently. In the framework of the developing interest in difficulty and interrogation based learning in degree it would be worth looking at the very likely group aspect that would derive from mixes of folks with different intellectual styles.
What do we imply by intellectual style?
Intellectual styles make reference to the preferred method an individual operations information and describe someone’s typical setting of pondering, remembering or perhaps approach to solving problems. Cognitive style simply denotes a tendency to believe and behave in a particular manner. Learning styles (for example these defined by simply Kolb 1984) specifically cope with different styles of learning. Cognitive and learning styles can be used to anticipate what kind of teaching approaches would be most effective intended for an individual or perhaps group. This kind of short piece focuses on cognitive styles that could be useful to consider when designing teaching for imagination.
Before talking about a specific cognitive style theory, it is important to examine the characteristics of cognitive design. Witkin and Goodenough (1981) believed that style is concerned with contact form rather than content material. In this was, style refers to the
manner in which we all characteristically procedure information. Models are also pervasive. Messick (1976) stated that "... designs cut across diverse spheres of behaviourвЂќ. In other words, the style that you have got at work you will most likely possess at home or perhaps play. Intellectual styles are stable as time passes; measured during time an individual's cognitive design will remain relatively the same (Witkin, Moore, Goodenough and Cox 1977).
Another important point regarding style is that it is not an either-or situation; Gregorc (1979) shows that many of us possess some of every style, nevertheless each individuals prefers one particular style above the other. Messick (1976) declares that "... each style has adaptive value depending on the situation.... no-one style is definitely consistantly more adaptive than another. вЂќ In this way, styles are вЂvalue neutral'. Every single style possesses its own strengths and weaknesses. Therefore , all styles will be valuable and useful. One of the promising intellectual style hypotheses to influence the discipline of imagination that I include found is usually Kirton's (1976) вЂadaptation-innovation' distinction. Mainly through his findings of managers, Kirton (1961) noted that some could actually initiate modify that better the current program, but were not able to identify chances outside it. He telephone calls these people вЂadaptors. ' Other managers were fluent for generating suggestions that resulted in more significant change, typically failed in...
References: Bloomberg, M. (1967) " A great Inquiry into the Relationship among Field
Independence-dependence and Creativeness. вЂќ inside the Joumal of Psychology, 67, p.
Gregorc, A. F. (1979) " Learning/Teaching Models: Their Nature and Effects.
Gryskiewicz, T. S. (1982) " Innovative Leadership Expansion and the Kirton
Adaption-Iinnovation Products on hand. вЂќ Conventional paper presented on the Occupational
Guilford, J. S. (1980) " Cognitive Styles: what are they will? вЂќ in Educational and
Psychological Way of measuring, 40, l
Kirton, Meters. J. (1977) " Manual of the Kirton Adaption-Iinnovation Products on hand. вЂќ in
London, Britain: National Base for Educational Research.
Messick, S. (1976) Personality Consistencies in Knowledge and Creative imagination, in T.
Spotts, M. V. & Mackler, W. (1967) " Relationships of Field-dependent and Fieldindependent Intellectual Styles to Creative Test out Performance. вЂќ in Perceptual and
MotorSkills, 24, p
Stein, M. 1 . (1975) " Stimulating Creativity. вЂќ N. Con.: Academic Press.
Witkin, They would. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, G. R. and Cox, L. W. (1977) " Fielddependent and Field-independent Cognitive Designs and their Educational
Implications. вЂќ in the Overview of Educational Study, 47, g
Witkin, L. A. and Goodenough, Deb. R. (1981) вЂќCognitive Variations: Essence and
Origin (Psychological Issues Monograph NO